1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Economics
  4. Volume 14, 2022
  5. Article

Annual Review of Economics

Volume 14, 2022

The Elusive Explanation for the Declining Labor Share

Abstract

A vast literature seeks to measure and explain the apparent decline in the labor share in national income that has occurred in recent times in the United States and elsewhere. The culprits include technological change, increased globalization and the rise of China, the enhanced exercise of market power by large firms in concentrated product markets, the decline in unionization rates and the erosion in the bargaining power of workers in labor markets, and the changing composition of the workforce due to a slowdown in population growth and a rise in educational attaintment. We review this literature, with special emphasis on the pitfalls associated with using cross-sectional data to assess this phenomenon and the reasons why the body of papers collectively explains the phenomenon many times over.

Keyword(s): capital share, income distribution, JEL E25, labor share, profit share
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080921-103046
2022-08-12
2024-05-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/14/1/annurev-economics-080921-103046.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080921-103046&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abdih Y, Danninger S. 2017. What explains the decline of the U.S. labor share of income? An analysis of state and industry level data Work. Pap., Int. Monet. Fund Washington, DC:
  2. Acemoglu D. 2002. Technical change, inequality, and the labor market. J. Econ. Lit. 40:17–72
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Acemoglu D. 2003. Labor- and capital-augmenting technical change. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 1:11–37
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Violante GL. 2001. Deunionization, technical change and inequality. Carnegie-Rochester Conf. Ser. Public Policy 55:1229–64
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Acemoglu D, Lelarge C, Restrepo P. 2020. Competing with robots: firm-level evidence from France. AEA Pap. Proc. 110:383–88
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. 2018. The race between man and machine: implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. Am. Econ. Rev. 108:61488–542
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. 2019. Automation and new tasks: how technology displaces and reinstates labor. J. Econ. Perspect. 33:23–30
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. 2020. Robots and jobs: evidence from US labor markets. J. Political Econ. 128:62188–244
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. 2022. Demographics and automation. Rev. Econ. Stud. 89:11–44
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Açkgöz T, Kaymak B. 2014. The rising skill premium and deunionization. J. Monet. Econ. 63:37–50
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Aghion P, Bergeaud A, Boppart T, Klenow PJ, Li H. 2019. A theory of falling growth and rising rents NBER Work. Pap 26448
  12. Amiti M, Heise S. 2021. US market concentration and import competition Staff Rep. 968, Fed. Reserve Bank New York New York:
  13. Arnold D. 2020. Mergers and acquisitions, local labor market concentration, and worker outcomes Work. Pap., Princeton Univ. Princeton, NJ:
  14. Atkeson A. 2020. Alternative facts regarding the labor share. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 37:S167–80
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Autor D, Dorn D, Hanson GH. 2013. The China syndrome: local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:62121–68
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Autor D, Dorn D, Katz LF, Patterson C, Van Reenen J. 2020. The fall of the labor share and the rise of superstar firms. Q. J. Econ. 135:2645–709
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Autor D, Salomons A. 2018. Is automation labor-displacing? Productivity growth, employment, and the labor share NBER Work. Pap. 24871
  18. Azar J, Marinescu I, Steinbaum M. 2020. Labor market concentration. J. Hum. Resour. 2020:1218–9914R1
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Azar J, Marinescu I, Steinbaum M, Taska B. 2020. Concentration in US labor markets: evidence from online vacancy data. Labour Econ. 66:101886
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Barkai S. 2020. Declining labor and capital shares. J. Finance 75:52421–63
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Barro RJ. 2019. Double-counting of investment NBER Work. Pap 25826
  22. Basu S. 2019. Are price-cost markups rising in the United States? A discussion of the evidence. J. Econ. Perspect. 33:33–22
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Becker GS, Murphy KM, Tamura R. 1990. Human capital, fertility, and economic growth. J. Political Econ. 98:5 Part 2S12–37
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Benkard CL, Yurukoglu A, Zhang AL. 2021. Concentration in product markets NBER Work. Pap. 28745
  25. Benmelech E, Bergman NK, Kim H. 2020. Strong employers and weak employees: How does employer concentration affect wages?. J. Hum. Resour. 2020:0119–10007R1
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Bentolila S, Saint-Paul G. 2003. Explaining movements in the labor share. B.E. J. Macroecon. 3:11–33
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Berger DW, Herkenhoff KF, Mongey S. 2019. Labor market power NBER Work. Pap 25719
  28. Berry S, Gaynor M, Scott Morton F 2019. Do increasing markups matter? Lessons from empirical industrial organization. J. Econ. Perspect. 33:344–68
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Bhandari A, McGrattan ER. 2021. Sweat equity in U.S. private business. Q. J. Econ. 136:2727–81
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Blanchard O. 1997. The medium run. Brook. Pap. Econ. Act. 28:289–158
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Blanchard O, Giavazzi F. 2003. Macroeconomic effects of regulation and deregulation in goods and labor markets. Q. J. Econ. 118:3879–907
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Bonfiglioli A, Crinò R, Fadinger H, Gancia G. 2020. Robot imports and firm-level outcomes Discuss. Pap. 14593, Cent. Econ. Policy Res. Washington, DC:
  33. Bridgman B. 2018. Is labor's loss capital's gain? Gross versus net labor shares. Macroecon. Dyn. 22:82070–87
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Bridgman B, Greenaway-McGrevy R. 2022. Public enterprise and the rise and fall of labor share. Econ. Inq 60:1320–50
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Brown EHP, Hart PE. 1952. The share of wages in national income. Econ. J. 62:246253–77
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Bustos P. 2011. Trade liberalization, exports, and technology upgrading: evidence on the impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian firms. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:1304–40
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Caballero RJ, Hammour ML. 1998. The macroeconomics of specificity. J. Political Econ. 106:4724–67
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Castro Vincenzi JM, Kleinman B 2020. Intermediate input prices and the labor share Work. Pap., Princeton Univ. Princeton, NJ:
  39. Cheng H, Jia R, Li D, Li H 2019. The rise of robots in China. J. Econ. Perspect. 33:271–88
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Chirinko RS. 2008. σ: the long and short of it. J. Macroecon. 30:2671–86
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Chirinko RS, Fazzari SM, Meyer AP. 2011. A new approach to estimating production function parameters: the elusive capital–labor substitution elasticity. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 29:4587–94
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Ciminelli G, Duval R, Furceri D. 2020. Employment protection deregulation and labor shares in advanced economies. Rev. Econ. Stat. In press. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00983
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  43. Cobb CW, Douglas PH. 1928. A theory of production. Am. Econ. Rev. 18:1139–65
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Cohen L, Early S. 2018. Globalization and De-Unionization in Telecommunications: Three Case Studies in Resistance Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  45. Dao MC, Das M, Koczan Z, Lian W. 2017. Why is labor receiving a smaller share of global income? Theory and empirical evidence Work. Pap., Int. Monet. Fund Washington, DC:
  46. Dauth W, Findeisen S, Suedekum J, Woessner N. 2021. The adjustment of labor markets to robots. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 19:63104–53
     [Google Scholar]
  47. De Loecker J, Eeckhout J, Unger G. 2020. The rise of market power and the macroeconomic implications. Q. J. Econ. 135:2561–644
     [Google Scholar]
  48. De Loecker J, Warzynski F. 2012. Markups and firm-level export status. Am. Econ. Rev. 102:62437–71
     [Google Scholar]
  49. De Ridder M. 2019. Market power and innovation in the intangible economy Work. Pap., Lond. Sch. Econ. London:
  50. Denison EF. 1962. The Sources of Economic Growth in the United States and the Alternatives Before Us Washington, DC: Comm. Econ. Dev.
  51. Dinlersoz E, Greenwood J. 2016. The rise and fall of unions in the United States. J. Monet. Econ. 83:129–46
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Dinlersoz E, Wolf Z. 2018. Automation, labor share, and productivity: plant-level evidence from U.S. manufacturing Work. Pap., Cent. Econ. Stud., US Census Bur. Washington, DC:
  53. Dixon J, Hong B, Wu L. 2021. The robot revolution: managerial and employment consequences for firms. Manag. Sci. 67:95586–605
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Doraszelski U, Jaumandreu J. 2019. Using cost minimization to estimate markups Work. Pap., Boston Univ. Boston, MA:
  55. Drautzburg T, Fernández-Villaverde J, Guerrón-Quintana P. 2017. Bargaining shocks and aggregate fluctuations NBER Work. Pap. 23647
  56. Drautzburg T, Fernández-Villaverde J, Guerrón-Quintana P. 2021. Bargaining shocks and aggregate fluctuations. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 127:104121
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Eden M, Gaggl P. 2019. Capital composition and the declining labor share CESifo Work. Pap. 7996, Cent. Econ. Stud. Munich, Ger:.
  58. Edmond C, Midrigan V, Xu DY. 2018. How costly are markups? NBER Work. Pap 24800
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Eisfeldt AL, Falato A, Xiaolan MZ. 2021. Human capitalists NBER Work. Pap 28815
  60. Elsby MWL, Hobijn B, Şahin A. 2013. The decline of the U.S. labor share. Brook. Pap. Econ. Act. Fall:1–63
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Farber HS. 2005. Nonunion wage rates and the threat of unionization. ILR Rev. 58:3335–52
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Farber HS, Herbst D, Kuziemko I, Naidu S. 2018. Unions and inequality over the twentieth century: new evidence from survey data NBER Work. Pap. 24587
  63. Feenstra RC, Hanson GH 2003. Global production sharing and rising inequality: a survey of trade and wages. Handbook of International Trade E Kwan Choi, J Harrigan 146–85 Oxford, UK: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Ganapati S. 2021. Growing oligopolies, prices, output, and productivity. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 13:3309–27
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Glover A, Short J. 2020. Can capital deepening explain the global decline in labor's share?. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 35:35–53
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Gollin D. 2002. Getting income shares right. J. Political Econ. 110:2458–74
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Gomme P, Rupert P. 2004. Measuring labor's share of income Policy Discuss. Pap. 14593, Fed. Reserve Bank Cleveland Cleveland, OH:
  68. Gouin-Bonenfant E 2020. Productivity dispersion, between-firm competition, and the labor share Work. Pap., Columbia Univ. New York:
  69. Graetz G, Michaels G. 2018. Robots at work. Rev. Econ. Stat. 100:5753–68
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Greenwood J, Hercowitz Z, Krusell P. 1997. Long-run implications of investment-specific technological change. Am. Econ. Rev. 87:3342–62
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Grossman GM, Helpman E, Oberfield E, Sampson T. 2017. Balanced growth despite Uzawa. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:41293–312
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Grossman GM, Helpman E, Oberfield E, Sampson T. 2021. Endogenous education and long-run factor shares. Am. Econ. Rev. Insights 3:2215–32
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Gutiérrez G. 2017. Investigating global labor and profit shares Work. Pap., New York Univ. New York:
  74. Gutiérrez G, Philippon T. 2017. Declining competition and investment in the U.S NBER Work. Pap 23583
  75. Gutiérrez G, Piton S. 2020. Revisiting the global decline of the (non-housing) labor share. Am. Econ. Rev. Insights 2:3321–38
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Hall RE. 1988. The relation between price and marginal cost in U.S. industry. J. Political Econ. 96:5921–47
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Harper MJ, Berndt ER, Wood DO. 1989. Rates of return and capital aggregation using alternative rental prices. Technology and Capital Formation DW Jorgenson, R Landau 331–72 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Hartman-Glaser B, Lustig H, Xiaolan MZ. 2016. Capital share dynamics when firms insure workers NBER Work. Pap 22651
  79. Helpman E. 2018. Globalization and Inequality Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  80. Herrendorf B, Herrington C, Valentinyi A. 2015. Sectoral technology and structural transformation. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 7:4104–33
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Hershbein B, Macaluso C, Yeh C. 2020. Monopsony in the US labor market Work. Pap., Fed. Reserve Bank Richmond Richmond, VA:
  82. Holmes TJ, Levine DK, Schmitz JA 2012. Monopoly and the incentive to innovate when adoption involves switchover disruptions. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 4:31–33
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Hopenhayn H, Neira J, Singhania R. 2018. From population growth to firm demographics: implications for concentration, entrepreneurship and the labor share NBER Work. Pap 25382
  84. Hsieh C-T, Rossi-Hansberg E. 2019. The industrial revolution in services NBER Work. Pap 25968
  85. Hubmer J. 2020. The race between preferences and technology Work. Pap., Univ. Pa. Philadelphia:
  86. Hulten CR. 1992. Growth accounting when technical change is embodied in capital. Am. Econ. Rev. 82:4964–80
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Humlum A. 2010. Robot adoption and labor market dynamics Work. Pap., Princeton Univ. Princeton, NJ:
  88. Jarosch G, Nimczik JS, Sorkin I. 2019. Granular search, market structure, and wages NBER Work. Pap 26239
  89. Jeon Y, Kwon CW. 2017. The offshoring threat and wage negotiations: theory and evidence. Jpn. World Econ. 45:19–29
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Jeon Y, Kwon CW. 2021. Offshoring, the threat effect, and wage inequality. Int. J. Econ. Theory 17:2135–50
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Johnson DG. 1954. The functional distribution of income in the United States, 1850–1952. Rev. Econ. Stat. 36:2175–82
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Jones BF, Liu X. 2021. A framework for economic growth with capital-embodied technical change. Work. Pap., Northwestern Univ. Evanston, IL:
  93. Jorgenson DW, Griliches Z. 1967. The explanation of productivity change. Rev. Econ. Stud. 34:3249–83
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Jorgenson DW, Griliches Z. 1972. Issues in growth accounting: a reply to Edward F. Denison. Surv. Curr. Bus. 52:565–94
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Kaldor N. 1961. Capital accumulation and economic growth. The Theory of Capital: Proceedings of a Conference Held by the International Economic Association DC Hague 177–222 London: Palgrave Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Karabarbounis L, Neiman B. 2014. The global decline of the labor share. Q. J. Econ. 129:161–103
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Karabarbounis L, Neiman B. 2019. Accounting for factorless income. NBER Macroecon. Annu. 33:167–228
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Kehrig M, Vincent N. 2021. The micro-level anatomy of the labor share decline. Q. J. Econ. 136:21031–87
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Keynes JM. 1939. Relative movements of real wages and output. Econ. J. 49:19334–51
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Koch M, Manuylov I, Smolka M. 2021. Robots and firms. Econ. J. 131:6382553–84
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Koh D, Santaeulàlia-Llopis R, Zheng Y. 2020. Labor share decline and intellectual property products capital. Econometrica 88:62609–28
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Kravis IB. 1962. The Structure of Income: Some Quantitative Essays Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  103. Krusell P, Ohanian LE, Ríos-Rull J-V, Violante GL 2000. Capital-skill complementarity and inequality: a macroeconomic analysis. Econometrica 68:51029–53
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Kuznets S. 1959. Quantitative aspects of the economic growth of nations: IV. Distribution of national income by factor shares. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 7:3 Part 21–100
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Kuznets S, Epstein L, Jenks E 1941. National Income and Its Composition, 1919–1938, Vol. 1 Cambridge, MA: NBER
  106. Lashkari D, Bauer A, Boussard J. 2021. Information technology and returns to scale Work. Pap., Boston Coll., Chestnut Hill MA:
  107. Lawrence RZ. 2015. Recent declines in labor's share in US income: a preliminary neoclassical account NBER Work. Pap 21296
  108. Leblebicioğlu A, Weinberger A. 2021. Openness and factor shares: Is globalization always bad for labor?. J. Int. Econ. 128:103406
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Li D, Bental B. 2019. A generalized growth model and the direction of technological progress Work. Pap., Tongji Univ. Shanghai, China:
  110. Lipsius B. 2018. Labor market concentration does not explain the falling labor share Work. Pap., Univ. Mich. Ann Arbor:
  111. Manning A. 2012. Monopsony in Motion Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  112. Nakamura E, Steinsson J. 2018. Identification in macroeconomics. J. Econ. Perspect. 32:359–86
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Oberfield E, Raval D. 2021. Micro data and macro technology. Econometrica 89:2703–32
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Olley GS, Pakes A. 1996. The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64:61263–97
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Prager E, Schmitt M. 2021. Employer consolidation and wages: evidence from hospitals. Am. Econ. Rev. 111:2397–427
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Ramey VA. 2017.. “Demographics and Robots” by Daron Acemoglu and Pascual Restrepo Discuss. Pap., Univ. Calif. San Diego: https://econweb.ucsd.edu/∼vramey/research/Ramey-discussion-Acemoglu-Restrepo-Robots.pdf
  117. Raval D. 2020. Testing the production approach to markup estimation Work. Pap., Fed. Trade Comm. Washington, DC:
  118. Rinz K. 2018. Labor market concentration, earnings inequality, and earnings mobility CARRA Work. Pap., Cent. Econ. Stud., US Census Bur. Washington, DC:
  119. Rognlie M. 2015. Deciphering the fall and rise in the net capital share: accumulation or scarcity?. Brook. Pap. Econ. Act. Spring1–69
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Rognlie M. 2019. Comment on “Accounting for factorless income. .” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2018Vol. 33:ed. M Eichenbaum, JA Parker, pp. 235–48 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Rosenfeld J. 2014. What Unions No Longer Do Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  122. Rossi-Hansberg E, Sarte PD, Trachter N. 2021. Diverging trends in national and local concentration. NBER Macroecon. Annu. 35:115–50
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Rothstein JS. 2016. When Good Jobs Go Bad: Globalization, De-Unionization, and Declining Job Quality in the North American Auto Industry New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
  124. Schmitz JA Jr. 2005. What determines productivity? Lessons from the dramatic recovery of the U.S. and Canadian iron ore industries following their early 1980s crisis. J. Political Econ. 113:3582–625
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Schubert G, Stansbury A, Taska B. 2021. Employer concentration and outside options Work. Pap., Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA:
  126. Smith A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations London: W. Strahan & T. Cadell
  127. Smith D, Ocampo S. 2021. The evolution of U.S. retail concentration. BLS Work. Pap. 526, US Bur. Labor Stat. Washington, DC:
  128. Smith M, Yagan D, Zidar O, Zwick E. 2019. Capitalists in the twenty-first century. Q. J. Econ. 134:41675–745
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Smith M, Yagan D, Zidar O, Zwick E. 2021. The rise of pass-throughs and the decline of the labor share Work. Pap., Princeton Univ. Princeton, NJ:
  130. Solow RM. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev. Econ. Stat. 39:3312–20
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Stansbury A, Summers LH. 2020. The declining worker power hypothesis: an explanation for the recent evolution of the American economy NBER Work. Pap 27193
  132. Sun C. 2020. Multinational production with non-neutral technologies. J. Int. Econ. 123:103294
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Syverson C. 2004. Market structure and productivity: a concrete example. J. Political Econ. 112:61181–222
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Syverson C. 2019. Macroeconomics and market power: context, implications, and open questions. J. Econ. Perspect. 33:323–43
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Taschereau-Dumouchel M. 2020. The union threat. Rev. Econ. Stud. 87:62859–92
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Traina J. 2018. Is aggregate market power increasing? Production trends using financial statements Work. Pap., Univ. Chicago Chicago:
  137. vom Lehn C. 2018. Understanding the decline in the U.S. labor share: evidence from occupational tasks. Eur. Econ. Rev. 108:191–220
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Weitzman ML. 1976. On the welfare significance of national product in a dynamic economy. Q. J. Econ. 90:1156–62
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Yeaple SR. 2005. A simple model of firm heterogeneity, international trade, and wages. J. Int. Econ. 65:11–20
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080921-103046
Loading
The Elusive Explanation for the Declining Labor Share
Annual Review of Economics 14, 93 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080921-103046
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080921-103046
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080921-103046
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Material

Supplementary Data

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error