Does remote work increase Tiebout sorting, the residential sorting by preferences for local public goods, services, and amenities? Although there is some empirical evidence of Tiebout sorting, commuting costs have historically limited its extent. Since remote work reduces such costs, this paper assesses whether remote work increases Tiebout sorting. I propose a novel instrument based on quasi-random variation in the timing, location, and magnitude of office lease expirations, which enables firms to adopt remote policies. Exposure to office lease expirations, measured at the block level, predicts self-reported remote work for individuals and higher remote work rates within neighborhoods. For individuals, remote work increases direct measures, increasing migration, public school enrollment, and tax migration. It has ambiguous effects on sorting by demographic proxies for public goods preferences. Migration cannot be explained by demand for lower cost and larger housing, as remote workers increase housing expenditures but not home size and ownership. For neighborhoods, a larger remote work share in 2020 increases subsequent residential turnover, demographic homogeneity, and variation in property taxes, suggesting migration, clustering on proxies of public goods preferences, and increases in property reassessments. Together, these results provide the first large-scale empirical evidence of the Tiebout mechanism, verify that tax base erosion is a consequence of remote work, and provide an alternative explanation behind recent migration patterns. Work in progress will explore the mechanisms driving these results, such as impacts of remote work on earnings, leisure time, fertility, and household formation.